Divij Joshi

Consultant

Divij Joshi is an independent lawyer and researcher. He graduated with a B.A., LL.B.(Hons.) degree from the National Law School of India University, Bangalore, in 2016. Subsequently, he joined a litigation practice in Bombay, and then as a research fellow, conducting legal and policy research on issues of technology, urban governance, and environmental laws.

 

He is presently a Mozilla Technology Policy Fellow, where he studies technology policy in India, with a focus on automated decision-making technologies. He is interested in studying the intersection of technology, law and political economy.

Blog

Non-Personal Data: Examining Data Trusts?

August 11, 2020

Data trusts have emerged as a recent but popular formulation to refer to a set of legal and institutional practices of data governance by collectives.  In the Draft Report, a ‘data trust’ refers to an institutional structure with certain shared protocols for containing and sharing data. The Draft Report frames a ‘data trust’ as a ‘data pool’ of sorts, to hold data from various sources, which is to be managed by public authorities.

Read more

Non-Personal Data Regulation: Interrogating ‘Group Privacy’

July 30, 2020

In the last post, we examined the Government of India’s Draft Report on Non-Personal Data, and its justifications for regulating NPD for ‘economic benefit’. This post examines the concept of ‘group privacy’, which has been presented as a justification for the regulation of NPD.

Read more

Non-Personal Data: The ‘Economic’ Case for Regulation

July 23, 2020

In the previous post, we introduced the Draft Report of the Committee on Non-Personal Data Regulation and analyzed its conception of ‘Non-Personal Data’ (“NPD”) as a category for regulation. There, we wrote about how the contours of NPD (as defined under the Draft Report) will necessarily entail conflicts with the proposed personal data protection regime in India. In this post, we set out to examine and critique the Committee’s justifications for why ‘Non-Personal Data’ should be regulated, in particular, on the ‘economic value’ justification for regulation.

Read more
Load more