Menstrual leave challenges workplaces to account for diverse needs better. This article argues that this is supported by the fundamental right of menstruating persons to decisional autonomy and does not necessarily rest on paternalistic sexism.
blog
blog
Menstrual leave challenges workplaces to account for diverse needs better. This article argues that this is supported by the fundamental right of menstruating persons to decisional autonomy and does not necessarily rest on paternalistic sexism.
blog
In Jane Kaushik v. Union of India (2025), the Supreme Court advanced transgender rights in India, holding both State and private actors accountable for discrimination. The Court expanded “reasonable accommodation” as a core constitutional duty, demanding structural change for equality and dignity.
blog
IFIM Law College hosted panel discussions on Uniform Civil Code in India. Satya Prasoon, an associate at CLPR was a panelist at the IFIM law school where he presented a paper titled ‘Of Constitutional Mythos and Nervous Nationalism: The Pathologies of UCC.’ The discussion was spilt into two panels, the first discussing the topic: “Constitutional Perspectives of the Uniform Civil Code” and the second, “The conflict of the UCC and personal laws in India”.