Sabarimala Temple Case: Should Regressive Religious Arguments Be Constitutionally Protected?

In this article in The Wire, Thulasi K. Raj argues that the exclusion arguments based on the right to religious freedom are not constitutionally protected.

Cite:

Thulasi K. Raj, 'Sabarimala Temple Case: Should Regressive Religious Arguments Be Constitutionally Protected?' (The Wire , 26 Oct 2017) <https://thewire.in/gender/sabrimala-temple-case-women-entry-regressive-religious-arguments> accessed on 16 Jan 2021