Sabarimala Temple Case: Should Regressive Religious Arguments Be Constitutionally Protected?

October 26, 2017 | Thulasi K. Raj

In this article in The Wire, Thulasi K. Raj argues that the exclusion arguments based on the right to religious freedom are not constitutionally protected.

Cite:

Thulasi K. Raj, 'Sabarimala Temple Case: Should Regressive Religious Arguments Be Constitutionally Protected?' (The Wire , 26 Oct 2017) <https://thewire.in/gender/sabrimala-temple-case-women-entry-regressive-religious-arguments> accessed on 24 Oct 2021