Dr. Beoncy Laishram v. The State of Manipur & Ors.

June 17, 2024 | Anish Saha
Case No. WP (C) 392/2024 Date of Filing 06/06/2024 Status Pending Petitioners Dr. Beoncy Laishram Respondents 1. State of Manipur, represented by Director, Department of University and Higher Education 2. The Director, Directorate of Education (School) 3. The Chairman, Board of Secondary Education 4. The Chairman, Council of Higher Secondary Education 5. The Registrar, Manipur University 6. THe Registrar, manipur medical Council

Dr Beoncy Laishram, a practising doctor at Rangini Memorial Charitable Clinic in Manipur, has taken a significant step by filing a petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Manipur seeking directives against the respondents for refusing to issue fresh educational certificates recognizing her changed name and gender identity. This move is noteworthy not only for its legal implications but also for Dr Laishram’s courage in speaking out against discrimination faced by trans individuals, highlighting the need for greater understanding and acceptance in society.

 

Dr. Laishram’s journey has not been easy. Born as Boboi Laishram, she underwent gender reassignment surgery and legally changed her name to Beoncy Laishram and her gender to female. However, despite providing all necessary documents, the respondents have denied her request for fresh educational certificates, citing the need for a court order. Her attempt to pursue higher education has been hindered by the lack of recognition of her changed name and gender. This refusal has forced Dr. Laishram to live a life that does not align with her true identity, prompting her to seek legal recourse.

 

Her case is rooted in the Constitution, citing violations of fundamental rights to life, equality, and gender identity under Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(a), and 21. She also draws strength from the Supreme Court’s judgment in National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (2014), a landmark case recognising the right to self-identify gender and mandated legal recognition of transgender persons’ self-identified gender.

 

Dr Laishram’s plea is not just about her individual case; it has far-reaching implications for the transgender community in India, especially in the Northeastern part of India. By seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue fresh educational certificates reflecting her changed name and gender, Dr Laishram is paving the way for others to follow in her footsteps. Her courage and determination are a beacon of hope for those struggling to find acceptance and recognition in a society often hostile to transgender individuals.

 

As the Hon’ble High Court of Manipur considers Dr. Laishram’s petition and subsequently a notice has been issued to the Respondents, it is essential to recognize the significance of this case. It is not just a legal battle but a fight for dignity, identity, and the right to live a life free from discrimination. Dr. Laishram’s bold step has the potential to inspire others to stand up for their rights, leading to a more inclusive and accepting society. The Court’s decision will be a landmark moment in the struggle for transgender rights in Northeast India, and it is hoped that it will be a step forward in the journey towards equality and justice for all.

 

The case is now posted for 17.07.2024.

Case No. WP (C) 392/2024 Date of Filing 06/06/2024 Status Pending Petitioners Dr. Beoncy Laishram Respondents 1. State of Manipur, represented by Director, Department of University and Higher Education 2. The Director, Directorate of Education (School) 3. The Chairman, Board of Secondary Education 4. The Chairman, Council of Higher Secondary Education 5. The Registrar, Manipur University 6. THe Registrar, manipur medical Council